Teams deploying agentic systems routinely face the same failure mode: nondeterministic agent behavior with no clear causal trace. The issue is rarely the model or prompt; it's almost always the state the agent reads and mutates.

Agents execute multi-step workflows, invoke external tools, and repeatedly update shared objects. Without snapshot isolation and version-aware reads, their view of the world can change mid-run.

Small inconsistencies, out-of-date reads, partial writes, interleaved updates, and compound into unreproducible decisions. The real failure sits beneath orchestration: object storage systems built for static artifacts, not concurrent autonomous processes.

This is the gap Tigris addresses with whole-bucket snapshots and bucket forking: capabilities absent from traditional object stores like S3. As teams scale parallel agents, they inevitably encounter write-write conflicts, cross-run contamination, and irreproducible states. These manifest as workflow or modeling failures, but the root cause is a lack of data-versioning semantics.

Object storage has become the de facto backing store for agent state, especially unstructured, rapidly evolving data. Yet, it offers no consistent reads, no causal ordering, and no per-agent isolation. Two agents updating the same bucket can overwrite each other’s work; long-running workflows may read intermediate writes; and lineage is effectively unknowable.

Once you recognize agents as concurrent processes mutating shared state, the failure patterns become obvious and unavoidable without isolation.

When GPT-5 thinks like a scientist
GPT-5 is transforming research with novel insights, deep literature search, and human-AI collaboration that accelerates scientific breakthroughs.
AI Accelerator InstituteMarisa Garanhel

The hidden fragility in today’s agent architectures

Current agent stacks focus on reasoning, tool invocation, and orchestration. The data layer becomes an unstructured sink:

  • ingest documents
  • generate embeddings
  • write summaries
  • update knowledge
  • Repeat

Every step mutates the state. Without isolation, these mutations accumulate silently, drifting far from the conditions any agent was actually operating under. Debugging becomes guesswork because traditional storage cannot answer the essential question: What did the agent see at that moment?

This lack of lineage and rollback prevents safe experimentation. You can’t reliably:

  • Reproduce a run.
  • Test new behaviors.
  • Roll back bad outputs.
  • Compare alternative strategies.
  • Allow multiple agents to act independently.

Without versioning primitives, iteration becomes stateful chaos.

A different way of thinking about storage

What differentiates Tigris is not throughput or another layer on top of object storage. It is a first-principles redesign of data semantics for agentic systems.

The core architectural choice is immutability. In Tigris:

  • Every write produces a new immutable version.
  • Deletes create tombstones rather than destructive mutations.
  • The system maintains a globally ordered log of state changes.

This enables precise lineage, deterministic reads, and reproducible historical views; capabilities that traditional object stores cannot provide.

The result is a storage substrate that behaves more like a versioned data system than a bucket of files, but remains S3-compatible on the surface.

Bucket forking: the missing primitive

Bucket forking brings Git-like workflows to unstructured data.

A fork:

  • is created in milliseconds (zero-copy; metadata-only).
  • inherits an exact snapshot of the parent bucket.
  • provides isolated write space for agents or workflows.
  • diverges safely without affecting the source dataset.

Agents running on a fork see a stable, immutable snapshot, ensuring deterministic reads. All mutations occur in a private lineage, guaranteeing isolation. When a fork yields desirable results, teams can promote selected objects back into production: data-aware, not code-style merging.

This enables safe experimentation for:

  • new agent behaviors.
  • alternate summarization or embedding strategies.
  • risky transformations.
  • debugging or reproduction of past runs.

Forks turn data into something you can branch, test, iterate on, and roll back with confidence.

Case Study: Loveable
Loveable, the Stockholm-based “vibe coding” platform, is demonstrating that Europe is still a prime incubator for global AI unicorns.
AI Accelerator InstituteAIAI

What fearless experimentation looks like

With bucket forking:

  • Teams can spawn multiple forks to try new RAG pipelines or labeling strategies.
  • Agents can run large-scale parallel transformations without corrupting production.
  • Researchers can reproduce any historical run from its associated snapshot.
  • Production systems can adopt forks only once validated.

Determinism becomes the default: every read is tied to a consistent snapshot, every write is isolated, and every change is traceable. Debugging shifts from log forensics to lineage inspection.

Under the hood (briefly)

The mechanisms that make forking feasible:

  • Snapshots: point-in-time views resolved via “latest version ≤ timestamp,” ensuring deterministic reads.
  • Immutability + global log: every version has a unique position in history, enabling reconstruction and lineage tracking.
  • Zero-copy forks: forks share underlying data and introduce only new metadata spaces for writes.
  • Predictable deletes: tombstones make removal reversible and inheritable.
  • Selective promotion: adopt only the desired changes from a fork into the main dataset, avoiding unsafe auto-merging.

Despite these semantics, the system remains fully S3-compatible, requiring no workload rewrites.

Why this matters now

Agents are increasingly deployed in production workflows: updating reports, enriching knowledge bases, transforming datasets, and making consequential decisions. Shared mutable state is the silent failure mode in these systems. Without isolation and versioning guarantees, even correct agent logic produces inconsistent results.

The next major reliability bottleneck in agentic systems will not be model quality; it will be the data layer.

Teams need:

They need forking, snapshots, and versioned state.

The bigger picture

Tigris is not a storage optimization; it is a shift in how AI systems treat data. We long ago accepted that code requires version control, lineage, and safe experimentation. AI exposes that data needs the same semantics, especially when agents reason over and modify that data autonomously.

By introducing immutable storage, snapshots, and bucket forking as first-class primitives, Tigris provides the data foundation that agentic systems have been missing.

Most teams won’t recognize the need immediately, but they will the moment their agents begin to diverge, overwrite, or behave in ways they cannot explain.